ANALISIS HUBUNGAN STRATEGI KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TERHADAP KEMAJUAN KEGIATAN AKADEMIK STUDI KASUS: UNIVERSITAS DARMA PERSADA
Abstract
Telah dilakukan penelitian tentang pengaruh penerapan strategi knowledge management terhadap proses penjaminan mutu perguruan tinggi. Hal ini dilakukan untuk memperkuat penelitian sebelumnya bahwa dengan strategi knowledge management mempunyai hubungan kausalitas terhadap kinerja staf akademik. Penelitian dilakukan dengan memberikan angket kepada 155 responden. Strategi personalisasi dan kodifikasi mempunyai pengaruh terhadap proses evaluating yaitu sebesar 2.63 dan 2.70. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan kegiatan evaluating berpengaruh significant terhadap kemajuan akademik (C.R=4.78).
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Awad, Elias M. & Ghaziri, Hasan M. (2003), Knowledge Management, New Jersey ,Person Education. Inc, .
Bakar, N.A., Din, S., Ng, A.H.H., & Yip, M.W. (2012). Integrated Knowledge Management Strategy: A Preliminary Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 57, pp. 209-214. Tersedia di (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S18770428120 46381) diakses tanggal 9 April 2013.
Beccera-Fernandez, I. (2004). Knowledge Management: Challenge, Solutions, and Technologies. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Boh, W.F. (2007). Mechanisms for Sharing Knowledge in Project-Based Organizations. Information and Organization, vol. 17, pp. 58-27.
DIKTI (2006). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi (SPM-PT). Dirjen DIKTI [6] Greiner, M.E., Böhmann, T., & Krcmar, H. (2007). A Strategy for Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 11 (6), pp. 3-15.
Gravetter, F.J., & Forzano, L.B. (2009). Research Methods for The Behavioral Science, (4th Edition). Wadsworth: Cengage LearningDikti, (2011). Leaflet Standar Penjaminan Mutu Internal
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. F. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Prentice Hall.
Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business Review, vol. 77(2), pp. 106-116.
Hansen, M.T., & Haas, M.R. (2001). Different Knowledge, Different Benefits: Toward A Productivity Perspective on Knowledge Sharing in Organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1–6.
Martini, A., & Pellegrini, L. (2005). Barriers and Levers Towards Knowledge Management Configurations: A Case Study-Based Approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 16, issue 6, pp. 670 – 681.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 14-37.
Nonaka, I.O, & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Malhotra, Y. (2005). Integrating Knowledge Management Technologies in Organizational Business Processes: Getting Real Time Enterprises to Deliver Real Business Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9(1), pp. 7–28.
Putri, R.E. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Kualitas Informasi pada Jejaring Sosial dan Official Website yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan untuk Melakukan Perjalanan Wisata Menurut Perspektif Backpacker di Indonesia. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer.
Santoso, S. (2012). Analisis SEM Menggunakan AMOS. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Santoso, S. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling. Elex Media Komputindo.
Sekaran, Uma. (1992) Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach (2nd Edition). New York: John Wiley n Sons
Setiorini, S. (2003). Faktor-faktor Knowledge Management yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Kependidikan.
Suryadi, Kadarsah (2005), Slide Kuliah : Managemen Pengetahuan. Laboratorium Sistem Informasi dan Keputusan, Program Studi Teknik Industri.
Zanjani, M.S., Mehrasa, S., & Mandana, M. (2008). Organizational Dimensions as Determinant Factors of KM Approaches in SMEs. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 45, pp. 394-289.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.